The Sarabite: Towards an Aesthetic Christianity

There is a continuous attraction, beginning with God, going to the world, and ending at last with God, an attraction which returns to the same place where it began as though in a kind of circle. -Marsilio Ficino

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Cleaning Up the Cosmos

Or: How a woman, who is so big, penetrates the eyes, which are so small;

A Reading of Ioan Couliano's Eros and Magic in the Renaissance

Tu Desnudez

La rosa:
tu desnudez hecha gracia.

La fuente:
tu desnudez hecha agua.

La estrella:
tu desnudez hecha alma.

-Juan Ramon Jimenez

(Your Nakedness

The rose:
your nakedness made grace.

The fountain:
your nakedness made water.

The star:
your nakedness made soul.)

Souls descend into the bodies of the Milky Way through the constellation of Cancer enveloping themselves in a celestial and luminous veil which they put on to enter terrestrial bodies. For nature demands that the very pure soul be united with the very impure body only through the intermediary of a pure veil, which, being less pure than the soul and purer than the body, is considered by the Platonists to be a very convenient means of uniting the soul with the terrestrial body. It is due to that descent that the souls and bodies of the planets confirm and reinforce, in our souls and our bodies respectively, the seven original gifts bestowed upon us by God. The same function is performed by the seven categories of demons, intermediaries between the celestial gods and men. The gift of contemplation is strengthened by Saturn by means of the Saturnian Demons. The power of the government and empire is strengthened by Jupiter through the ministry of the Jovian Demons; similarly, Mars through the Martians fosters the soul's courage. The Sun, with the help of the Solar Demons, fosters the clarity of the senses and the opinions that make divination possible; Venus, through the Venereans, incites Love...

-Marsilio Ficino

There is great presumption amongst Catholic intellectuals that the Renaissance is the beginning of the end of "Christendom" and the beginning of all things nasty about the modern world. As it was put to me in seminary in a very curt and self-assured manner, Luther revolted against the secularization of the medieval mind by those lascivious Italians, but in the process, he began the long march to postmodern agnosticism. Luther wanted Christ without the Church. The Enlightenment wanted God without Christ. The nineteenth century wanted morality without God. And the postmodern world doesn't even want morality. But it all began with the deification of man by those decadent Italians. They began the whole historical process that has led to modern science, rationalism, and revolutionary humanism...

Like all myths, this one has its very romanticist appeal. It looks at the inexplicable past through the lens of its own presumptions on how people thought and acted centuries ago. And it can give its adherents the confidence that they themselves have been saved by their perfect faith in their absolute difference from the modern world. As long as they can stay in their mountain sanctuaries, listen to sacred polyphony, decry any type of painting after Fra Angelico, and read St. Thomas Aquinas like the Talmud, they are safe from the contemporary contagion. It is only with very meticulous scholarship such as Ioan Couliano's that we clearly see that this attitude is only the other side of the postmodern coin.

Couliano is not a Christian scholar. One could even call him "anti-Christian" in his perspective. A protege of Mircea Eliade, he is an observer of all traditions and an adherent of none. His aim, then, is neither to refute nor confirm Christianity directly. Of the three figures that loom the largest in his book, Marsilio Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandolla, and Giordano Bruno, the first was a priest, the second a latter-day follower of Savonarola, and the third an unrepentant heretic. What we wish to address here is not whether Christianity was weakened or strengthened during the Renaissance. It is, rather, what version of Christianity won out, or in other words, how would Christians subsequently change how they believed and how they viewed the world.

Central to Couliano's book is the idea of phantasm. According to traditional ancient epistemologies, man perceives the world through the creation of phantasms in the imaginative faculty. To be very simplistic about it, man perceives the world like he falls in love: an image is engraved into his mind like the figure of a beautiful woman is engraved into the heart. One thus falls in love with the object, one becomes a slave to the phantasm.

The lover carves into his soul the model of the beloved. In that way, the soul of the lover becomes the mirror in which the image of the loved one is reflected.

-Marsilio Ficino, De Amore

Renaissance culture was a culture of the phantasmic. It lent tremendous weight to the phantasms evoked by inner sense and had developed to the utmost the human faculty of working actively upon and with phantasms. It had created a whole dialectic of Eros in which phantasms, which at first foisted themselves upon inner sense, ended by being manipulated at will. It had a firm belief in the power of phantasms, which were transmitted by the phantasmic apparatus of the transmitter to that of the receiver. It also believed that inner sense was preeminently the locale for manifestations of transnatural forcers - demons and the gods.

-Couliano, pg.193

Magic, then, is the manipulation of phantasms in order to acquire a certain end. Magic has more to do with love and less to do with any idea of magic we have nowadays. One of the greatest feats of magic for Giordano Bruno, for example, is what we would now call the manipulation of mass media. For Bruno, you can manipulate phantasms not just to do a party trick, but also to make entire societies do what you want. It is from here that we get ideas of white magic versus black magic present in the Renaissance. Love is a magician, according to Ficino since,

the whole power of Magic is founded on Eros. The way Magic works is to bring things together through their inherent similarity. The parts of this world, like the limbs of the same animal, all depend on Eros, which is one; they relate to each other because of their common nature. Similarly, in our body the brain, the lungs, the heart, the liver, and other organs interact, favor each other, intercommunicate, and feel reciprocal pain. From this relationship is born Eros, which is common to them all; from this Eros is born their mutual rapprochement, wherein resides true Magic.

-Marsilio Ficino, De Amore

Love, then, was the way to manipulate the universe. The magician performed certain rituals in a dispassionate manner in order to coax things into becoming a certain way, or rather, to reveal how things really were. One such manner was the famous Art of Memory. Another was hieroglyphics. As Couliano writes,

Ficino...conceived of philosophy as an initiation into mysteries, consisting of a gradual rise in intellectual loftiness receiving in response from the intelligential world a phantasmic revelation in the form of figurae.

Through the "performance" of these hieroglyphic figurae,the eye of the soul would open up and thus be able to see the reality not visible with the naked eye. Another gadget was the Iynx, a golden disk with various graphic symbols that such historical figures as Proclus claimed to use to produce rain and other phenomena. Even the abbot of Wurzburg, Trithemius, was rumored to have practiced magic, when he made appear the ghost of the wife of the Emperor Maximilian.

Now, dear reader, you must be thinking that I have totally gone off my rocker. "Does he give any credence to any of this rubbish?" is something that you might be asking. You might think this is all the work of the devil or simple superstition. There is, however, a very rigorous and comprehensive vision of the universe at play here, one that we have long since renounced. For many Renaissance Neoplatonists, the soul fell from the heights through the various spheres of the planets, and that is why the zodiac has any power to predict our tendencies and even our actions (without totally denying free will). We are, at least in our souls, consubstantial with the stars since we fell through them. In this sense, in the Renaissance cosmos, all things are connected and influence each other. That is why even important clerics watched the stars and believed in alchemy. They had a vision of the universe where the default presupposition was that everything meant something, whereas we think that all things are meaningless unless proven otherwise.

The innocence of the "magical" point view can be best described by the following quote from Henricus Cornelius Agrippa:

It is possible in a natural way, removed from superstition and without the intercession of any spirit, for a man to transmit his trend of thought to another man at no matter what distance and location, in a very short time. It is possible to estimate the exact time it takes, but all that takes place within twenty four hours. I knew how to do it myself, and I have often done it...

What Couliano is formulating is that what occurred at the time of the Renaissance was not the birth of the modern scientific mind, but the flourishing of ancient, other-worldly arts. And these were not necessarily demonic or hostile to the Christian view of the universe. They were, rather, a different way of doing things and seeing the world than what we have now. What was prevalent was a belief that the universe was a very enchanted and interconnected place.

For Couliano, then, we did not inherit the world that the Renaissance made, but rather actively broke with the frame of mind that the Renaissance and the time before it had. The Romanian scholar gives the analogy of a wingless fly that only survives in the Galapogos Islands. Genetically, wings of flies aide in their being able to survive and thrive, except in the windy conditions of some South American islands where having wings would make mobility a lethal disadvantage. Thus Couliano characterizes in this way the point of view of modern science where,

people had lost the habit of using their imagination and thinking in terms of "qualities", for it was no longer permitted. Loss of the faculty of active imagination naturally entailed strict observation of the material world revealed by an attitude of respect for all quantitative data and suspicion of every "qualitative" statement.


Because modern science was deemed more innocuous to what was perceived as a Faith in the process of reformation, it was allowed to flourish, while the other arts were suppressed as overly sensuous and even demonic. Of the Protestant Reformation, the massive iconoclasm and rejection of "medieval superstition" speak volumes for the case of the censorship of phantasms and the imagination. But even in Catholic countries, the rationalization and codification started at the Council of Trent of the liturgy and clerical discipline were also indicative of the same reformation. After all, one of the things the Council of Trent did was ban all books on astrology. Couliano also points out how even women's style of dress changed. Women tried to hide their more sensual features, to the point that the style of dress in Catholic Spain was just as repressive as in Calvinist Geneva. As Couliano put it,

The Catholic faith and the Protestant denominations have drawn as close together as possible without being aware of it. Henceforth it is no longer a question of Reformation or Counterreformation... Side by side, they build a common edifice: modern Western culture.


"What is the big deal,then?" you might be asking yourself. To be brief, I would say that the ultimate danger of this modern Western culture is that in warring against eroticism, phantasms, and superstition, it made the universe a dead and vacuous place. From a perhaps overly imaginative vision of the cosmos that was full of angels, demons, and other spirits, we obtain a perspective of the universe as a bunch of randomly floating dead rocks. This has little to do with science and more to do with "scientism": a refusal to look past quantities and the idea that the world is a giant cold grid of numbers. And this effects how we philosophize, theologize, and contemplate our world. Couliano expresses this by the following:

To read in the "book of Nature" had been the fundamental experience in the Renaissance. The Reformation was tireless in seeking ways to close that book. Why? Because the Reformation thought of Nature not as a factor for rapprochement but as the main thing responsible for the alienation of God from mankind.


Citing the Catholic figure of Blaise Pascal, Couliano puts it all quite succinctly that in the Reformed universe there was only "the silence of God exiled from nature".

We, then, are not children of the Renaissance, but rather children of the Reformation, regardless of our creedal affiliations. What has led to our much decried modernity according to Couliano is not the victory of one form of Christianity over the other, but an attempt to purify the cosmos of wonder and magic. It is this destroying of the power of imagination and enthroning of the quantified, dead cosmos, that has given birth to secular society, not the victory of "subjectivism". We killed God because we killed nature. This has meant not the enthroning of man in God's place, but rather the dissection of man to the point where he is nothing, an accidental speck in the meaningless universe. Renaissance humanism, on the other hand, viewed man as the microcosm and image of God, a king in a wondrous and vibrant Creation. This of course is a provocative thesis, but one worthy of much consideration.

I do not expect you, the reader, to buy into what I am saying without further consideration. That is not the point of this essay. What I am saying with Couliano is that our idea of the world is also based on many flawed assumptions and to people in the Renaissance it may have appeared as absurd as alchemy and astrology do to us. Our vision of the world is just as much a product of evolution and historical accident as any other, and it inevitably will change. What I would like you to take away is that maybe our vision of the world is even more toxic to the Christian Faith than the pagan "superstitions" that were being revived in fifteenth century Italy. Maybe in our cleaning up of the cosmos, we threw out the baby of the noble imagination with the "pagan" bathwater.


At 9:11 AM, Blogger Magotty Man said...

Well, Doug Wilson (!) said the modern mind rejects mythology, not because it is 'false', but because it reminds him of the numinous, and that he can't bear.

I have been re-reading "That Hideous Strength" by Lewis, and note some interesting parallels with what you said here.

Note also that as the moden vision became sterile, sexula morality fell, and dysfunction etc took over.

At 9:50 AM, Blogger Arturo Vasquez said...

Footnote: The purpose of this post is not to simply decry the ethos of our age nor is it to long for an age that was much better than ours. If anything, the solutions to the malaise described here is very much in our grasp, and does not require a nostalgia for a better day that has passed. If anything, to rekindle the imagination is something that I work at on this blog, and it could be argued that this age is a great time to start.

At 1:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello, I've been reading along in your blog after seeing it linked on another one that I can't remember. Just want to say that your writing is appreciated and in modern parlance I would say you have some mad blogging skills.


At 8:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

WOW, I am to slow for this post.
I need to re-read it.
You are deep.

At 9:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is your recently married friend with half a brain (Not because of getting married)(and Thank you for the prayers and the poetry gift)

I already have a JD and even post JD work and certificates but am going to apply for another Masters for the credit of reading your Blog. Maybe a Masters in theology, philosophy, comparative religion--or all just for reading your blog. You can send me the degree.

I think that modernism (not in a theological sense per se) dismisses myths just as myths and fails to see any deeper meaning. Maybe not esoteric in an occultic sense but at least meaning beyond it merely being a story or an obvious moral point. Could God work grace and even miracles in other religions? Is there truth (or Truth) in other "pagan" or "mystical" traditions that predated Christiantiy or that are not Christian?

I think your linking the Incarnation and the sanctification of Creation and specifically art allows a lot of interesting possibilities (at least theoretically)

But than again, it is late at night for me and I may not know what I am talking about.

There was a (12th Century I think) Vatican librarian named Agustino Steuco who believed there was knowledge that was a sacred knowledge present in all cultures.
He was not only the Vatican librarian (and I think elevated to Bishop eventually but I could be wrong) but also a linguist in Arabic, Aramaic and other languages. He was well read in many topics. I know this is dangerously closed to some Gnostic elements--and I am not a Gnostic and I am loyal to Holy Mother Church and I am obedient to decisions--but there is freedom to read and search but I would not teach nor eventually believe if it would contradict the Magisterium.

Nonetheless, as you mentioned with the Chinese Rites controversy with the famous Jesuit Matteo Ricci SJ or other similiar controversies like with Jesuit Roberto di Nobili SJ in India--there are cultural traditions that are completely compatible with Christianity and at least at times they have been excluded based on racist or innapropriately triumphalistic grounds.

On book that includes pagan myths, Greek philosophy, and Christianity is Dante's Inferno (and Purgatorio and Paradisio)(what some say is the best example of Italian literature ever)--it is certainly a beautiful artistic poem that seems to have spiritual truth and exploration. It combines many extra Biblical concepts and stories/traditions yet to me seems fully Catholic (I could be wrong)

I don't know if make any sense but these are my thoughts on your post.

Please pray for me. I will pray for you. Let us all (even if I am flawed and wrong) explore and discover the Truth and may your Blog help people find Truth and Beauty.

At 12:46 PM, Blogger Mack Ramer said...

How can we go back, though, to a magical world? I think if we abandoned our quantitative mindset, it might be at the expense of (extremely beneficial) technological advancement. After all, isn't that same quantitative mindset a corollary of, if not prerequisite for, things like the mass production of the automobile (let alone PCs!), modern medicine and agricultural techniques, etc.? I mean, magic is all well and good, but it couldn't cure things like Polio and Smallpox!

At 2:46 PM, Blogger Arturo Vasquez said...


It's not a question of either/or.

It's rather both/and.

Sorry, that was responding with a cliche. I think it would help if we realized that not all problems will be solved by quantatative thinking. Nor am I advocating a return to Renaissance magic; that would be impossible and, as you point out, not very wise. It would be nice, however, to acknowledge our own poverty in some areas, and this poverty has been caused by our neglect of the more mysterious side of things. It is not a question of giving something up, but rather adding another neglected perspective.

In particular, I would like to posit certain concerns that certain Catholic writers neglect:

1. Is the whole subjective/objective divide even worth spending any time on? Is the aim of philosophy to "make sense" of the world the way we make sense of a car engine, or is it rather to initiate us into mysteries that we "can't understand", in a manner of speaking? That is, is the human intellect an island which find its own source of nourishment and hapiness, or does its hapiness, and hence the solution to all of its problems, reside in its communion with something above itself. How self-sufficient is the intellect, then, in this regard? Are the arguments over the objective/subjective divide merely arguments over dried bones, the remains of a mind trapped in a cosmos separated from God. In that regard, the only real way to impose any objectivity is by force and not by persuasion.

(It could be argued, however, that this is just fallen human nature; there is no "objective" way of persuading anyone of anything, but that is not very Platonic, is it? More like Nietzsche's "der wille zur macht".)

Thought, therefore, even in its most dialectic and syllogistic forms, is a necessary catharsis in order to pass into a realm that is above human understanding.

2. Just as in the ancient understanding of the formation of a human being, to learn philosophy, theology, or any other discipline, it is not merely a question of studying such and such a question, and thus knowing the "facts" about it, but rather of true transformation by truth and virtue. The aim, ultimately, is not to know but rather to be; not to know the truth, but rather through an appreciation of the true, the good, and the beautiful, to become the Truth, in the image and likeness of God in Jesus Christ. Thus, even if you can recite questions of the Summa Theologiae in Latin backwards and forwards, but have no love for art, music, literature, or even of a nice day walking in the hills or in a park, as a human being, and thus as a Christian, it avails you very little.

I suppose I would like to think that there is not some "minimalist" formula for what the Christian message ultimately means. I can concede that my mother will never appreciate a concerto by Bach nor will my grandfather ever read a sonnet by Gongora, but in their own way, they do acheive that love for beauty in simplicity and humility. We, who have the burden of being able to appreciate the above mentioned things, should not squander these opportunities. If we continue to beat the world with apologetic and doctrinal sticks without positing as well the flowers that the Christian imagination has produced, all we are doing is trying to catch flies with vinegar instead of honey.

3. As to Renaissance magic itself, we should not abandon the scientific point of view, but rather only consider its limitations, which are our limitations. We do not really know how we are effected by the entire world around us. Can the alignment of planets, stars, the Moon, etc. effect things how we behave? Maybe science will one day prove or disprove this stuff definitively. There is just so much we do not know, and I think a thorough acknowledgement of our own creaturehood is a very wise thing.

We are both very weak and very strong, so tiny and yet the measure of the cosmos. God became man, He did not become a star or a planet. That is the strangest paradox about our universe, but one that by definition makes it a far more enchanted place than we can ever imagine.

At 6:12 PM, Blogger Mack Ramer said...

Spot on!

What's your favorite Bach concerto?

At 9:08 PM, Blogger Arturo Vasquez said...

Concerto for 2 harpsichords, strings & continuo in C minor, BWV 1060

At 5:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Having technology in a "magical" worldview is not mutually exclusive.
Many groups like Opus Dei, Hassidic Jews among others completely embrace technology but have a traditional worldview.
They are not Luddites nor Amish.
Some of the greatest scientists (like Newton) were also alchemists.

At 7:28 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

ninest123 16.01
louis vuitton, michael kors outlet, ray ban sunglasses, tiffany and co, louis vuitton, chanel handbags, replica watches, ugg boots, prada outlet, tiffany jewelry, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton outlet, nike air max, oakley sunglasses, prada handbags, burberry outlet online, ray ban sunglasses, replica watches, longchamp outlet, oakley sunglasses, jordan shoes, oakley sunglasses, michael kors outlet, ugg boots, louis vuitton, polo ralph lauren outlet, uggs on sale, burberry, michael kors outlet, longchamp, ugg boots, gucci outlet, michael kors, nike outlet, louis vuitton outlet, louboutin outlet, louboutin, polo ralph lauren outlet, nike air max, nike free, christian louboutin outlet, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, ugg boots, ray ban sunglasses, longchamp outlet, louboutin shoes, tory burch outlet

At 7:31 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

air force, nike trainers, sac longchamp, sac guess, tn pas cher, coach outlet, new balance pas cher, ray ban pas cher, air max, timberland, true religion jeans, north face, nike roshe, nike free run uk, abercrombie and fitch, vans pas cher, michael kors, michael kors, ralph lauren pas cher, burberry, michael kors, ralph lauren uk, hollister pas cher, nike free, lacoste pas cher, true religion outlet, air jordan pas cher, nike blazer, louboutin pas cher, true religion jeans, nike roshe run, vanessa bruno, hogan, longchamp pas cher, ray ban uk, lululemon, converse pas cher, longchamp, hollister, mulberry, nike air max, michael kors, nike huarache, nike air max, replica handbags, north face, coach purses, oakley pas cher, nike air max, true religion jeans, hermes

At 7:34 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

reebok shoes, herve leger, soccer shoes, vans, iphone cases, ray ban, timberland boots, new balance, p90x workout, instyler, converse, hollister, valentino shoes, hollister, mcm handbags, mac cosmetics, celine handbags, ferragamo shoes, abercrombie and fitch, chi flat iron, iphone 6 plus cases, beats by dre, nfl jerseys, mont blanc, oakley, north face outlet, gucci, soccer jerseys, lululemon, ipad cases, iphone 5s cases, birkin bag, iphone 6 cases, louboutin, ralph lauren, baseball bats, vans shoes, iphone 6s cases, nike roshe, asics running shoes, nike air max, jimmy choo shoes, iphone 6s plus cases, nike air max, insanity workout, s5 cases, north face outlet, wedding dresses, ghd, bottega veneta, giuseppe zanotti, babyliss

At 7:37 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

bottes ugg, louis vuitton, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, replica watches, canada goose, doke gabbana outlet, moncler, sac louis vuitton pas cher, swarovski, louis vuitton, swarovski crystal, marc jacobs, moncler outlet, canada goose, louis vuitton, pandora jewelry, pandora jewelry, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, juicy couture outlet, moncler, louis vuitton, ugg pas cher, pandora charms, moncler, wedding dresses, pandora charms, supra shoes, moncler, coach outlet, canada goose outlet, moncler, barbour, canada goose, thomas sabo, canada goose outlet, toms shoes, doudoune canada goose, canada goose uk, links of london, canada goose, montre pas cher, hollister, juicy couture outlet, moncler, barbour jackets, karen millen, lancel, converse outlet, moncler, ugg boots uk
ninest123 16.01

At 1:43 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

bucks jerseys
nike blazer pas cher
nike air max 2015
minnetonka outlet
coach outlet
soccer jerseys
thunder jerseys
oakley sunglasses
denver broncos jerseys
adidas trainers

At 7:57 PM, Blogger jeje said...

louboutin outlet
issey miyake perfume
ralph lauren outlet
moncler online
canada goose jackets
off white nike
nike shoes
moncler outlet
superdry clothing

At 8:55 PM, Blogger AB78 said...

polo outlet
uggs outlet
vans shoes
michael kors uk
oakley sunglasses
true religion jeans
nike presto
michael kors
toms shoes
tag heuer watches


Post a Comment

<< Home